Відео

im trying to build a 2d layout of a guitar and then make it 3d. My bezier curves do not stay 0* on the z axis and it creates different heights on my curves. How do i zero out the z axis so it will remain on the same plane while i build my initial layout?

Great tutorial!

Awesome!

Really detailed tutorial, it was very helpful because normally I do things like spending ages trying to get rid of the triangles because I thought it needed to be all in quads. The only thing I noticed is that at 11:15 you can use the edge slide tool with auto merge turned on alternatively to just speed up the process a bit!

I liked the video but i got lost with subdivision/crease stuff. I do not see why there was even a need for subdivision.

Chris your videos are the best! How do you decide whether to use subdivision modelling vs creating rounded edges manually with the bevel tool? Just curious about your workflow choices.

I always thought Agx is wrong, those massive saturation loss is way too much, I couldn't understand why many thought this is ok. ACES desaturation is way less and much more realistic. With Kronos we now have the opposite, no saturation decreasing at all. More usable in everyday work but it may be too saturated at the very edge.

Outstanding explanation of these basics, and enough specificity about controls and tools to really get me started. Thank you.

They say the moon is a ball , reflecting the earths light .. and why do we only see one side of the moon at all times ? Nasa lies

25:16 You can make the loop slide have an even offset by pressing the “e” key. From the Docs: Even E Forces the edge loop to match the shape of the adjacent edge loop. You can flip to the opposite vertex using F.

Great video! Would love to have a tutorial on how to improve lighting skills to look more realistic besides the basics of HDRI or 3 lights set up that doesn’t really bring realistic rendering. Thanks

If you’re flipping a value from positive to negative, you don’t actually need to click on the field. Just pressing - when hovering over a field will make it negative (or positive if it’s already negative)

Thank you for the info, and especially the correct pronounciation of "bezier."

Your videos are great, discovered them the other day. You definitely know your stuff. It's crazy how different people's workflows can be in Blender. I don't use a lot of gizmos, but it's interesting to see how you use them. It really paints a different visual understanding of how some of the operations work in Blender. You blew my mind with the bevel shaping, I never thought to set a bevel shape of 1 to do boundaries along edges, but now I use them all the time. Lol. One thing I like to do for arrays and mirrors is to use an empty as the origin point. That way I can edit individual components with geometric origins without having to mess with the 3D cursor or pivot points as much. Not necessarily better, just different!

Wasn't there a way to edit modifiers for multiple objects at the same time or is that going to be a feature in 4.2, I can't remember.

The whole pivot snapping workflow is great, totally gonna use that, thanks.

Inches are bad in real life where unit translations are necessary, but online (especially for less professional renders) you can get away with approximating it, or just using 0.9 meters instead of 0.9 inches and just scaling it around in the final render to be about right.

setup snap on vertex on and automerge on and shift d and middle mouse to contraint movement to z then box select and delete half of the circle then box select the 2 verts and extrude below. all done and it auto merge also to get that capsule shape. all done in vertex mode and box selection window mode.

shift tab to activate that snap op as you are in vertex mode already to snap to vertex easily and snap off to toggle it.

It's a shame we can't use the shrink/fatten tool on edges only. But that temporary geometry solution seems to work for every case, right?

Wonderful Sir

❤❤❤❤❤❤

Standart + Filmic + Agx = Khronos )

Very helpful keep going 👍

You are such a brilliant explainer!

This was a very interesting video, but I am having a hard time figuring out how specular maps fit into this new process. I have specular maps that I have used for many years that no longer work as expected when mapped to an object. It's especially frustrating when I have a texture that previously had an irregular specular; portions had high specularity and portions had very low or almost no specularity. The mapping doesn't appear to affect this any longer. I can see the effects of the map, but now the entire object maintains a constant level of specularity, with the portions mapped to have higher specularity appearing normally, but the portions having low to no specularity still providing specularity, even high enough to provide reflections where previously the texture map did not.

Tank you for the video !!! I fully missed this news.

all the options are different. blender is designed so nobody can learn it because every tutorial is always old and unfollowable.

You are the best teacher I’ve found when it comes to learning new color spaces and tone mappers. I’ve learned nearly everything I know from your videos about AgX, Filmic, and now Khronos! I just want to ask though, what would you recommend for additional resources for learning more about color spaces, tone mappers, and achieving the best-looking results in various cases?

thank you, ill try it now, i wonder... if i want the cords to tangle at some point how will it be...Also I cant seem to find that it starts after a certain point, i just starts in 0, cant make it started later

This is such a great educational video

Downloaded 4.2 and I cannot get Color Management to show the differences from AGX, FIlmic, or Khronos, seems to be broken.

PHD level teaching

Great video again Chris. I think Kronos is the future and will replace all alternative Color Spaces in Blender in the dailie work. I don't think someone will ever use the others again. Of course it's always better to render in raw format and make the postproduction later. But I think Kronos makes a lot of things easier and other modes obsolete.

I'm sorry but i think filmic still looks best in all the examples. Khronos seems to just blend the worst elements of AGX and Standard: As colors get brighter they become oversaturated and then become undersaturated, with very obvious delineations, while filmic is the only one that keeps the saturation consistent throughout the gradient, at least in appearance. Does it look faded? Sure but it'll be alot easier to add a simple curves on top of that than trying to resaturate only the highlights in AGX and Khronos.

Modeling the top Cap section is missing. Really want to see the process of it.

I think AGX is superior for more realistic scenes, the new khronos one has a more disney pixar feel to it, perfect colors in a vacuum where the colors don’t experience any shift. Perfrct for products and animation but maybe not if you are trying to create a cohesive room or environment where agx might help blend things better and then you just apply a hue of color on top of the image.

Not sure but seems everything I render in 4.2 is worse quality than in 4.1. EVEE now blows out the contrast more and Cycles looks muted and im using imported settings from 4.1

Great video series. Is it possible to get the artwork you created to follow along

when will blender cloth work like a normal turk?

Oh no. Here comes yet again new update videos that makes me want to switch to beta...

Would be very interested to see a video on the new Thin film feature for the principled V2

Thanks Chris, just experimented with this myself and have to say the results have been amazing when compared to the AgX maps.

Always interesting videos

Thats nice, but usually color soutions are rather like too short quilt, and if you cover your head you have cold feet, so what are the downsides of this transformer, where are the weakest points?

As always. Informative and clearly explained video. Thank you.

another OCIO?

The improvement between Khronos and Agx is bigger than the improvement between Agx and Filmic.

So, should everyone use Khronos for everything? What are its weaknesses, or where would you still see a use for something like AgX, rather than Khronos?

That's great news! I always had a color problem, be it with my monitor, or filmic / agx. I understand that colors aren't supposed to be saturated much, but when I ask for 255 maximum RED color, and I get a desaturated one, it gets very annoying. Now I can actually make my diffuse map a full 255 RED, and do zero corrections on the lighting and composition!